Best Deals nikon 70 200 f2 8 g ed if af s vr

All you can say is: WOW!, May 5, 2008

By 

R. Lanthier (Vienna, VA United States) – See all my reviews

  

  

Who would have thought that Nikon could have improved on the already excellent 60mm micro? How?

1) It no longer extends when focusing.

2) Hood is now included, and is bayonet style, not screw on.

3) AFS. Quiet focusing.

4) 9 nine rounded aperture blades (instead of 7 straight) for very pleasant bokeh.

5) As sharp as the old one.

6) New Nano crystal coatings supposed provide better color and contrast (only time will tell on this one).

Is it worth the upgrade? Check this list and see if these are important to you. If not, you can pick us a used 60mm AF(D) micro or maybe still find a new one for less money. As I was not replacing but buying a short macro for the first time, I got this latest version and am very very happy with it.

Is it worth the higher price? I certainly think so, but others may disagree. Shop around, there are better prices at good stores. Avoid Broadway photo and its related sites.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment (1)

Super sharp, quick and fast, May 16, 2008

By 

D. Renner “Beastt” (Arizona) – See all my reviews

  

I bought this lens as my entry into shooting macro and haven’t been at all disappointed. I was concerned about the claimed 7.2″ minimum focus but apparently, that’s only for the auto-focus because focusing manually I can get down to 2 or 3 inches. All images are superbly sharp with good color reproduction. This lens will not disappoint, however, if distance is a concern you may wish to look at the Sigma 150mm Macro or Nikon’s own 105mm Micro lens. After being so satisfied with this Nikon 60mm I broke down and bought the Sigma 150mm macro as well and I’m glad I did. Both have their specific uses and sometimes the shorter focal length of this Nikon is exactly what I need for a specific situation. The Sigma is at least as sharp and perhaps a little more versatile as well as being (arguably), one of the best macro lenses currently available.

Unless you need to really keep your distance, this lens will serve your needs and blow you away with the crisp detail and accurately saturated color in the pictures you’ll produce. I didn’t think I could get close enough to some subjects but working slowly, I’ve had the end of this lens within 2-inches of wild fence lizards and inside of the minimum possible focal distance with subjects like grasshoppers and bees.

It’s almost one of those rare “can’t go wrong” situations. Buy it, you’ll be glad you did.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comments (2)

Sharp, flat field, fast to use, July 29, 2008

By 

R. Geoghegan – See all my reviews

  

An excellent lens. AF and MF both work well on my D200 in macro work and general use. AF-S lets the focus be easily controlled manually after AF, without moving switches. It’s a good size match for the D200-300 line. It shouldn’t overwhelm the smaller Nikon bodies.

The 60mm focal length gives more perspective & depth compared to longer lenses. It’s also great for informal portraitsnon DX format, fitting into the short end of the classic 85-105mm range from film. I like all these aspects. They do mean there’s a wider background and you’re closer to the subject compared to longer alternatives.

Close focus is a hair tighter than 1:1. You have about 7.5″ from the sensor-film plane to the subject. This translates to just under 2″ from the lens front, or 1/2″ from the front of the hood. The hood can be a problem that close. Backing off to 1:1.5 gains about an inch of distance. DX gives 1×1.5″ field there to match 1:1 on FX or film. By 1:3 you’ve got 4+ inches in front of the hood. You get used to adjusting focus and framing with a mix of lens and camera movements. It’s easier in practice than some have described, even on a tripod.

The lens is incredibly sharp and contrasty. You stop down from wide-open for DOF, not because you need better sharpness. Papery low contrast detail on flowers is captured well. Out of focus areas are smooth. Some say it’s got the best Micro-Nikkor optics ever (see Bjorn Rorslett’s site). You have to look hard to see this lens’s few optical flaws (like barely visible CA).

Possible drawbacks (debatable):

The 60 mm focal length is short for some people’s taste. Longer macro lenses do give greater working distance. Instead the 60 AF-S is smaller & lighter than 90-105mm macro-micro lenses. The price is lower if you’re comparing Nikkors.

Manual focus gearing is quite fast. Infinity to close focus is about 180 deg. Finger tip movements take it from infinity to 7 feet. Manual focus gearing works better in the near range. Slower gearing or even variable ratio would help, though.

[Edited to correct focus & working distances]

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment